Skip to main content

keepin’ it REAL Rural

Summary 
  • Need: A drug and alcohol prevention program for middle school kids that is specific to rural culture in Pennsylvania and Ohio.
  • Intervention: An adaptation of the evidence-based keepin' it REAL curriculum was customized for rural middle school students.
  • Results: Students showed a reduction in all substance use and less personal acceptability of substance use.
Evidence-level
Effective (About evidence-level criteria)
Description

According to a 2007 study published in The Journal of Rural Health, rural adolescents have higher levels of tobacco, alcohol, and methamphetamine use than their non-rural counterparts. In addition, kids residing in rural areas often begin using drugs at an earlier age.

keepin it REAL Rural logo

For over 20 years, the Drug Resistance Strategies (DRS) Project, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, has examined how adolescents refused drug offers. This research led to the development of the multicultural school-based substance use prevention program, keepin’ it REAL (kiR). “REAL” is an acronym for Refuse, Explain, Avoid, and Leave. These four strategies of saying “no” were the most common responses among 300 interviews with youth around the country. Using these stories, program creators Dr. Michelle Miller-Day and Dr. Michael Hecht constructed ten interactive lessons that use video and other highly involving teaching techniques.

kiR’s motto is “From kids, through kids, to kids.” The prevention messages of kiR reflect aspects of adolescents’ actual experiences told by the kids themselves. The program’s curriculum utilizes a “cultural grounding” model to incorporate traditional cultural values and practices to protect against substance use.

Much like the initial program formation, the rural adaption of kiR used interviews to construct culturally grounded curriculum. To better understand substance offers in the rural context, 118 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12- to 19-year-old adolescents from rural school districts in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Also similar to the original kiR, high school kids were paired with film personnel to make five-minute videos central to the prepared lessons.

The following video briefly highlights the development of the kiR prevention curriculum:

In 2007, this program was funded by a National Institute on Drug Abuse grant.

Services offered

Features of the curriculum include 10 lessons delivered over a 10-week period. Lessons offer students the opportunity to act out the REAL Strategies of Refuse, Explain, Avoid, and Leave. All lessons:

  • Run for 40-45 minutes
  • Promote interaction between students and teachers
  • Feature fun-themed activities that engage students in learning

The curriculum also uses a series of five videos produced by youth and based on students’ real stories as a key learning tool. To ensure that the video material is relevant and engaging, creative teams of high school students from Pennsylvania and Ohio produced the videos to reflect local culture.

Here is an introductory video from kids who have developed videos for the kiR program:

For consistency in delivery, each lesson is constructed the same way:

  • Review the previous lesson
  • Show the animated introduction story to engage students, review the previous lesson, and introduce this week’s lesson
  • Explain the basic concepts
  • Describe the concepts and skills
  • Practice the skills
  • Apply the Decision-Making Model
  • Review the lesson and complete the Journaling activity
  • Show the Closing Story
Results

According to a 2015 study published in Prevention Science, positive changes were observed in students who received the rural kiR program.

When curriculum was delivered with higher levels of teacher and student engagement, students showed positive outcomes compared to students receiving a poorly implemented program, which might only meet curriculum objectives. When engagement was high, students reported:

  • Less overall drug use
  • Less personal acceptability of substance use
  • A reduction in alcohol use
  • A reduction in smoking and chewing tobacco use
  • A reduction in marijuana use
  • Conservative perceptions of peer prevalence

Efficacy and peer acceptability were not significantly altered. However, since kiR presents substance use as a risk with potentially negative consequences and not as an inherent wrong, it follows that the program would have little effect on this variable.

A cost-benefit analysis from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Prevention suggests that kiR returns $28 for every dollar spent.

In the 2016 U.S. Surgeon General's Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health, the keepin' it REAL curriculum for youth is one of three universal prevention programs identified as:

  • Effective for preventing youth drug use
  • Cost-effective
  • Equally effective in white and specific racial and ethnic minority populations
Cover Page Rural

keepin' it REAL Rural has programs in the following states:

  • Arizona
  • Georgia
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Nebraska
  • New Jersey
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • Virginia
  • Washington

In 2009, Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) adopted the kiR curriculum. The D.A.R.E. scientific advisory board selected kiR from over 200 listings on a national registry of evidence-based programs maintained by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. D.A.R.E. has expanded the kiR program to numerous communities, both urban and rural.

Research and publications relating to kiR Rural:

Pettigrew, J., Graham, J., Miller-Day, M., Hecht, M., Krieger, J., & Shin, Y. (2015). Adherence and Delivery: Implementation Quality and Program Outcomes for the Seventh-Grade keepin’ it REAL Program. Prevention Science, 16(1), 90-99. Abstract

Colby, M., Hecht, M.L., Miller-Day, M., Krieger, J.R., Syvertsen, A.K., Graham, J.W., & Pettigrew, J. (2014). Adapting school-based substance use prevention curriculum through cultural grounding: A review and exemplar of adaptation processes for rural schools. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(0), 190-205. Free Full-text

Pettigrew, J., Miller-Day, M., Krieger, J., & Hecht, M. (2012). The Rural Context of Illicit Substance Offers: A Study of Appalachian Rural Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(4), 523–550. Free Full-text

Pettigrew, J., Miller-Day, M., Krieger, J., & Hecht, M.L. (2011). Alcohol and other drug resistance strategies employed by rural adolescents. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39, 103-122. Free Full-text

Barriers

Communities and schools differ widely in their resources. The variance in resources seriously impacts any strategy for local production of narrative substance use prevention videos as well as the ability to recruit local partners in curriculum development. For example, rural schools recruited had less access to video production facilities and faculty expertise than the urban schools that participated in the development of the original set of kiR videos.

Another challenge for a program based on “cultural grounding” comes from the fact that rural adolescents are not a homogenous population. The program creators stated that it was important to avoid stereotypes of rural life. Although many share a common living experience, such as isolation from urban sprawl, it’s possible for kids to hold different family values, political views, and opinions of authority.

Additionally, rural identity played both a positive and negative factor in substance prevention. For example, identity and societal role were strongly tied to the “small town” social reality. Being labeled as a substance user of any kind meant that information could easily spread to family members within the close-knit circle of rural communities. On the other hand, rural communities can come with ingrained dangers to substance introduction. Program creators observed that cultural “rites of passage” (such as boys trying beer or chewing tobacco on a hunting trip) were far more prevalent in rural communities.

Replication

With such a focus on culturally grounded curriculum, it is highly encouraged to execute internal interviews and then create local videos and other media materials used in the program to reflect local reality. Live performances are also an option. Regardless of the tactic used, both provide essential engagement among students and an opportunity for creativity.

The best way to quickly and smoothly implement the kiR curriculum without financial cost is to connect with your local D.A.R.E. program. Police officers teach curriculum as a police/school relationship bond, thus avoiding any extra responsibility on school faculty.

If D.A.R.E. is not an option, organizations can contact program leaders directly through information found on the REAL prevention website. Materials are mailed out based on request but will eventually be available for download.

Contact Information
Michelle Miller-Day, PhD, Program co-creator
REAL Prevention
814.883.6362
michelle@real-prevention.com
Topics
Alcohol use
Children and youth
Illicit drug use
Schools
Substance abuse
Tobacco use
States served
Ohio, Pennsylvania
Date added
December 18, 2015
Date updated or reviewed
March 31, 2017

Please contact the models and innovations contact directly for the most complete and current information about this program. Summaries of models and innovations are provided by RHIhub for your convenience. The programs described are not endorsed by RHIhub or by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. Each rural community should consider whether a particular project or approach is a good match for their community’s needs and capacity. While it is sometimes possible to adapt program components to match your resources, keep in mind that changes to the program design may impact results.