by Candi Helseth
As the only patient navigator in the cancer program at Central Vermont Medical Center in Berlin, Theresa Lever says what she enjoys most about her job is there that is “no such thing as a typical day.” She works one-on-one with patients to minimize barriers that may impede their cancer treatment. How she accomplishes that varies widely.
“It can be really overwhelming for a patient who is already sick to deal with all these medical issues that can become barriers to treatment and healing,” said Lever, who previously spent 28 years as a nursing home social worker. “You can’t remove all of a patient’s stress. But by helping with little things like their need for transportation or daycare while they have treatments, you can help lessen their stress. I’m there to help with anything that might be an obstacle for them.”
Just as Lever doesn’t have a typical day, there doesn’t appear to be a “typical” patient navigator (PN). Job descriptions, educational requirements and program models vary widely across the nation. Patient navigators’ educational backgrounds range from community residents trained for specific navigation purposes to registered nurses and other professionals with advanced degrees. The rapidly growing Cancer Patient Navigators of Georgia (CPNG) provides services throughout the entire continuum of cancer care, from prevention and screening activities to end of life care. In Kentucky, a PN program focuses solely on getting Appalachian women with abnormal Pap smears to access follow up care. In Texas, patient navigators known as promotores help patients better control their chronic diseases.
Dr. Harold P. Freeman is credited with pioneering the patient navigation concept in 1990 for the purpose of eliminating barriers to timely cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care for poor and underinsured populations. Dr. Freeman’s work gained national recognition, ultimately resulting in the passage of the Patient Navigator Act of 2005. Patient navigation has proven so effective in cancer care models that the American College of Surgeons’ Commission on Cancer 2012 Cancer Program Standards (Standard 3.1) require cancer programs to phase in patient navigation services by 2015.
Common barriers patient navigation addresses include language and cultural differences, lack of transportation, financial pressures such as lack of insurance or inability to pay deductibles, and psychosocial issues.
GEORGIA: CONTINUUM OF CARE
CPNG, with services in nearly 30 counties and 254 patient navigators to date, is the first and only state to bring cancer patient navigators of all levels and working in various programs together within one organization, according to Angie Patterson, Director of Patient Navigation and Survivorship for the Georgia Cancer Coalition.
“Everyone works together but communities continue to be the boots on the ground for programs in their areas, and some communities have developed patient navigation models specific to their needs,” Patterson explained. “In the Rome (Ga.) area, there’s a separate non-profit that provides patient navigation for all area patients, regardless of the hospitals where they are being treated. In southern Georgia where there’s a higher incidence of colorectal cancer, a regional cancer coalition works with local oncologists to provide free colonoscopies. Patient navigators there insure that everyone over 50 gets screened for colorectal cancer.”
Because their research has shown that rural people living farther away from major medical centers are less likely to participate in screenings or treatment models such as clinical trials, CPNG affiliated programs work closely in rural areas with local faith-based organizations and centers of social interaction such as schools.
“We’ve found that rural patients are more likely to participate if encouraged by a local authority figure they trust,” said Karen Beard, director of the Georgia Society for Clinical Oncology (GASCO). “Georgia is hugely diverse and we have a wonderful laboratory here to figure out what type of patient navigation works best depending on the community circumstances and conditions relevant to each area.”
Beard added that Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health assists with development of methodology for best outcomes and quality data to establish outcomes. Rollins has also developed a Train the Trainer patient navigation module that is being provided free to Georgia hospitals.
“There is data from studies in Georgia, which demonstrate that, with patient navigation, care improves and costs can be reduced for chronically ill patients,” Beard said. “ER usage is reduced because patients can contact their patient navigator first to provide triage of the situation and coordinate care in the most appropriate setting.”
Patient navigation is an important component in the success of the Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan overseen by the Georgia Department of Public Health, Beard said. CPNG organized in 2008 under the umbrella of the Georgia Cancer Coalition, an initiative of the Georgia Research Alliance. CPNG is supported by GASCO and various sources of private and public funding.
“We think what we’re doing here in Georgia is pretty unique and it’s really exciting for us because we have so many different things going on throughout the state,” Patterson said. “Our members are learning from each other and communicating directly with each other through a member website. Hospitals in other states are contacting us to share our stories of how to implement patient navigation. Ultimately, the best part of this story is that our patients with cancer are the ones who are really benefiting.”
KENTUCKY: ADVOCATE FOR ADHERENCE
In Kentucky, county public health departments provide cervical cancer screening services (Pap tests) for women living in rural Appalachian areas of the state. Yet a high number of women identified as having abnormal Pap tests did not pursue the recommended follow-up care. With a grant from the National Cancer Institute, the University of Kentucky Prevention Research Center began a patient navigator program to improve adherence for recommended follow-up treatment.
Cervical cancer statistics from 2010 showed that cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates were higher in Appalachian regions than in other areas of the United States. Of six central Appalachian states, Kentucky had the highest cervical cancer mortality rates.
“We saw this as an opportunity to focus on a cancer where we could make a positive difference,” Principal Investigator Mark Dignan said. “With regular Pap tests, cervical cancer can be detected at precancerous levels and with timely treatment, the cure rate is excellent.”
Initial research revealed these women were less likely than their non-Appalachian counterparts to seek follow-up care. Reasons included a lack of personal and public transportation, long distances to providers, scheduling conflicts with childcare and work, financial problems, and cultural and trust issues related to medical care. To address these issues, six women who were lifelong residents of Appalachian Kentucky were recruited and trained to be patient navigators.
“We looked for people who had good communication and relationship skills,” Dignan said. “Then we provided them with education about cervical cancer, the Pap test and follow-up care as well as training in strategies to encourage women to obtain the needed follow up care.”
Public health nurse case managers referred patients to the patient navigators, who met with the women, assessed barriers for follow-up care and helped schedule appointments. PNs also did appointment reminders and performed logistical tasks, such as helping with paperwork and arranging transportation.
Dignan said they anticipated reaching 450 women and were pleased that 519 women 18 and older participated. Project analysis is underway now and final results should be available soon.
The University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center also offers an American Cancer Society Patient Navigator Program to improve the quality of life for cancer patients, survivors and their caregivers.
TEXAS: CONTROL OF CHRONIC CONDITIONS
Transformacion Para Salud (No longer available online) uses a patient navigation model that sends promotores to patient homes to work with patients who have chronic diseases that are “out of control.”
“This is a medically vulnerable and underserved target population who simply have not been practicing self management techniques, which contributes to increased illness and hospitalizations,” said Christina R. Esperat. “The promotores teach patients to better understand their disease process and empower them to practice self management techniques for improved control.”
Esperat, who is associate dean for Clinical Services Engagement in the Texas Tech University (TTU) School of Nursing, is also the Transformacion Para Salud project director. TTU is administrator for the Larry Combest Community Health and Wellness Center, a nurse-managed Federally Qualified Health Center serving Lubbock County and surrounding rural areas. Center patients with poorly managed diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) and asthma are referred to the promotores, who visit patients at home over a two-year period, addressing the patient’s progress at each visit. The promotores begin by building a relationship with the patient to gain trust and encourage patient compliance. Promotores provide education about the particular disease and its process and help the patient set goals and make lifestyle changes to improve the patient’s medical condition. For instance, with patients who are diabetic, promotores help the patient set goals such as monitoring glucose, exercising daily and making good nutritional choices. The promotores then works with the patient on an ongoing basis to minimize choices that might impede the patient’s adherence to these lifestyle changes. Promotores also assist patients with a variety of other health-related issues, such as transportation needs, support resources and health-related paperwork.
Patient Navigator Program Project Coordinator Debra Flores said patients cannot be mandated to participate so promotores need good personal skills as well as ongoing training related to chronic disease support. Funding from a HRSA grant supports the project, which includes hiring and training the promotores. Four promotores each completed 160 hours in state requirements to attain certification as community health workers and then completed an intermediate training curriculum developed by nurse practitioners at the Larry Combest Center. They continue ongoing training under Flores’ direct supervision.
“We continue collecting data to assess our overall success,” Flores said. “In our first demo project, we were able to see statistically significant results in patients in terms of reductions in hemoglobin, A1C, hypertension, cholesterol and lipids. Patients also showed statistically significant changes pre- and post-navigation in behavioral components and making self-efficacy changes. A preliminary sample also found that for those with asthma, improved disease management significantly reduced hospitalizations and ER visits.”
In the first two years, 200 patients received navigation services. There are 139 patients enrolled in the current cohort. Data is being collected to assess overall results.
VERMONT: COORDINATION OF CARE
In Berlin, Vermont, Lever said the need for patient navigation services became apparent in 2009 with the long-awaited opening of a radiation oncology center to accompany existing CMAP cancer services. Berlin, a town of 3,000, serves a region of 66,000 potential patients.
“Our physicians and cancer services are not under the same roof so as patient navigator, I began with the intent of helping patients navigate through our system,” Lever said. “The job just grew and grew from there.”
She contacts individuals to schedule mammograms or screenings, works with patients to bill insurance or find other means of financial assistance, coordinates transportation for appointments, and may even arrange temporary housing. At one point, she said, four patients diagnosed with mental illness were simultaneously receiving cancer treatment. All four were also homeless.
One of Lever’s most rewarding patient interactions was helping a patient with prostate cancer keep his home. He was unable to work full time because his wife was permanently disabled and he cared for her, and he had been unable to pay their property taxes the last three years. Lever researched Vermont’s tax laws and helped the patient receive an abatement. Then she accessed funding resources to help the couple pay the taxes that weren’t abated.
“Getting a cancer diagnosis is like being in a foreign land,” Lever said. “These patients are dealing with unfamiliar systems and unfamiliar environments. We patient navigators are the natives and we’re here to practice hospitality. I can’t fix all their problems, but I can help them get through this piece of life a little easier.”
For more information, see:
Back to: Spring 2012 Issue