Rural services integration programs are conducting evaluations to track process and outcome measures to determine how well the program achieves its goals. Identifying an appropriate evaluation framework is a key component of the evaluation design and important for evaluation planning. The best framework for evaluation often depends on the type of program you are evaluating and the resources available for conducting evaluation activities. For example, there are several different methodologies devoted to care coordination evaluation frameworks and telehealth programs evaluation.
Frameworks that have been used to evaluate services integration programs include:
Assesses whether the program is being implemented as originally intended, what services are being delivered, who is receiving those services, and perceptions of the program among stakeholders.
Assesses the extent to which a project achieved its stated outcome goals and provides recommendations for future program improvements.
Assesses a program's effect on participants and stakeholders, including outcomes and the changes that resulted from those outcomes.
Assesses baseline metrics compared to other data points at key points in time on a continuous basis throughout program implementation. Services integration programs are using the Plan-Do-Study-Act framework to integrate new knowledge, make midcourse corrections, and implement continuous improvements into their programs.
Assesses the relationship between the project costs and the outcomes (or benefits). Policy makers, funding organizations, and other stakeholders can use evaluation findings to determine whether an investment in program development and implementation yields significant outcomes of interest.
Return on Investment (ROI)
Some rural services integration programs are calculating the ROI for their program by examining healthcare savings and social cost savings.
Resources to Learn More
Evaluation Strategies for
Human Services Programs
The guide lays out the basic principles of evaluation design, including common problems, constraints, and ideas for problem solving. The tools can be applied generally, but the example in the guide evaluates a services integration program for vulnerable children and youth.
Author(s): Harrell, A., Burt, M., Hatry, H., Rossman, S., Roth, J., & Sabol, W.
Organization(s): The Urban Institute
Excerpts from Review of Evaluation
This toolkit outlines evaluation process and activities and explain the benefits and challenges of evaluation frameworks.
Author(s): Kahan, B.
Organization(s): The Saskatchewan Ministry of Education