Testing New Approaches
Why Rural-specific Demonstration Projects Are Needed
The healthcare delivery system is undergoing dramatic change, with an emphasis on finding new approaches and organizational frameworks to:
- improve health outcomes,
- control costs, and
- improve population health
Financial incentives are changing from a focus on volume-based services to value-based services. There is a concurrent need to better measure and account for quality of care in all settings and improve transitions of care as patients move from one care setting to another.
Advances in technology and new approaches to organizing care delivery are occurring quickly, with examples like the patient-centered medical home, accountable care organizations, and patient-safety organizations.
Most early adopters of new care models have been large, urban-based integrated delivery systems. Less is known about how these changes and environmental factors will affect rural healthcare delivery systems. Because rural healthcare providers are often paid outside of the traditional prospective payment systems and fee schedules, there is less known about how new and emerging models might function in rural communities. As a result, policy makers and rural providers need to better understand the implications of new and emerging models for low-volume rural settings.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center was established through the Affordable Care Act. The Innovation Center tests new payment and service delivery models that may reduce cost, while also providing care of similar or higher quality. A June 2012 policy brief from the National Advisory Committee on Rural Health and Human Services, Rural Implications of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, discusses the potential for CMS demonstrations to address rural needs and offers recommendations specific to rural demonstrations.
The Rural Health Value program, with support from a Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) cooperative agreement, examines the rural implications of demonstration projects and other changes to healthcare organization, finance, and delivery. The Rural Health Value website provides analyses of innovations undertaken in a rural setting, as well as resources for organizations interested in undertaking similar programs.
Rural-Specific Initiatives Being Tested by FORHP
Rural Maternity and Obstetrics
Management Strategies (RMOMS) Program – ongoing
Focuses on improving maternal healthcare in rural communities. Funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA) Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) and Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), this four-year program allows awardees to test models of maternal healthcare to address unmet needs for populations that may experience poor health outcomes, health disparities, and other inequities. The first cohort (2019-2023) includes rural networks in Missouri, New Mexico, and Texas. Evaluation of the Rural Maternity and Obstetrics Management Strategies Program: First Annual Report provides an overview of the first cohort’s 2019-2020 planning year, their planned approaches to the program, and early lessons learned. The second cohort (2021-2025) includes rural networks in Minnesota, Missouri, and West Virginia.
Planning and Development Program Awards – ongoing
An initiative from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) to expand the physician workforce in rural communities. In 2019, HRSA awarded three-year grants to recipients in 21 states to develop rural residency programs in family medicine, internal medicine, and psychiatry. Grant recipients include rural hospitals, community health centers, Indian Health Service-operated health centers, Indian tribes and tribal organizations, and schools of medicine. In fiscal year 2021, HRSA awarded 9 additional grants to recipients in 7 states.
Rural-Specific Demonstrations Being Tested by CMS
Community Health Access and Rural
Transformation (CHART) Model – announced
This rural-focused initiative includes two tracks for participation. The Community Transformation Track will fund rural communities to develop and implement a healthcare delivery redesign strategy. The application period for this track closed on May 11, 2021. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) anticipates announcing the lead organizations selected to participate in the Community Transformation Track in fall 2021. The Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) Transformation Track will select rural-focused ACOs to receive advanced payments as part of joining the Medicare Shared Savings Program. The request for applications for this track will be released in spring 2022.
Frontier Community Health
Integration Project (FCHIP) – extension period announced
Developed and tested new models for the delivery of healthcare services in frontier areas through improving access to, and better integration of, the delivery of healthcare to Medicare beneficiaries. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, authorized a five-year extension period for participating Critical Access Hospitals beginning on July 1, 2021.
Designed to improve the financial viability of rural Pennsylvania hospitals and reduce the growth of hospital expenditures across payers, including Medicare. Participating rural hospitals will be paid monthly based on fixed all-payer global budgets and redesign their healthcare delivery system to improve quality and access in rural Pennsylvania communities. Jointly administered by CMS and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Model is open to Critical Access Hospitals and acute care hospitals in rural Pennsylvania. A similar model, the Maryland Total Cost of Care (TCOC) Model, is underway for the entire state of Maryland, including rural areas, and sets a per capita limit on Medicare total cost of care in Maryland. The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model (PARHM): First Annual Report evaluates the first year of the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model (PARHM).
Hospital Demonstration – ongoing
Implements cost-based reimbursement in participating small rural hospitals that are not eligible for Critical Access Hospital designation. Designed to assess the impact of cost-based reimbursement on the financial viability of small rural hospitals, and test for benefits to the community. The Report to Congress: Rural Community Hospital Demonstration, issued in October 2018, summarizes findings from the first twelve years of the demonstration.
Rural-relevant demonstrations involving accountable care organizations (ACOs):
Next Generation ACO
An initiative for ACOs experienced in coordinating care for populations of patients. Allows higher levels of financial risk and reward than available under the Medicare Shared Savings Program.
All-Payer ACO Model – ongoing
Offers ACOs in Vermont the opportunity to participate in an initiative involving the most significant payers in the state - Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial health care payers. CMS made start-up funding available to help Vermont providers with care coordination and collaboration with community-based providers. The August 2021 report Evaluation of the Vermont All-Payer Accountable Care Organization Model: First Evaluation Report summarizes findings from the first two performance years of the model.
Note: The Medicare Shared Savings Plan now offers a BASIC and an ENHANCED track, with a July 1, 2019 start date. See the application timeline and the CMS fact sheet, Final Rule Creates Pathways to Success for the Medicare Shared Savings Program, for additional information. It will take time to see the extent to which rural providers participate in these new ACO tracks.
Additional rural-relevant demonstrations being tested by CMS:
Bundled Payments for Care
Improvement Advanced (BPCI Advanced) Model – ongoing
Participating providers receive a single bundled payment for a clinical episode of care, based on the expected costs of all items and services provided during the episode. Aims to reduce Medicare expenditures while maintaining or improving quality of care. Participants in this model include rural hospitals.
Primary Care Plus (CPC+)
Focuses on improving the quality, accessibility, and efficiency of primary care through regionally-based multi-payer payment reforms and care delivery transformation. Provides participants with technical assistance and up-front enhanced payments as a way to promote practice building capabilities. Providers participate in one of two tracks depending on their existing care delivery activities. Both available tracks qualify as an Advanced Alternative Payment Model under the Quality Payment Program (QPP).
- Round One – ongoing
- Round Two – ongoing
Professional Direct Contracting (GPDC) Model – ongoing
A set of two voluntary payment model options that were introduced to innovate Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) approaches to produce value and high-quality care outcomes. The goal of this model is to reduce burden, support a focus on beneficiaries with complex, chronic conditions, and encourage participation from organizations that have not typically participated in Medicare FFS or CMS Innovation Center models.
Emergency Triage, Treat, and Transport
(ET3) Model – ongoing
Permits ambulance care teams to use alternate models of emergency health care, such as telehealth treatment and transport to alternative destinations, to improve quality and lower costs of care. Rural Medicare-enrolled suppliers or hospital-based ambulance providers without current medical dispatch and/or telehealth are eligible to participate.
Health Care Innovation Awards (HCIA)
Tests a wide range of innovative projects to deliver better health, improved care, and lower costs via Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), particularly for beneficiaries with the highest healthcare needs. Includes projects that serve rural populations.
Care for Kids (InCK) Model – participants announced
A child-centered local service delivery and state payment model aimed at reducing expenditures and improving the quality of care for children covered by Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) through prevention, early identification, and treatment of priority health concerns. The goals of the InCK Model are to improve child health, reduce avoidable inpatient stays and out-of-home placements, and create sustainable alternative payment models (APMs). Participants include providers serving rural populations in Illinois, Ohio, and Oregon.
Diabetes Prevention Program (MDPP) Expanded Model – ongoing
A structured behavior change intervention that aims to prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes among Medicare beneficiaries with an indication of prediabetes.
First Model Options – ongoing
A set of five voluntary payment model options with the aim of rewarding value and quality through innovative payment structures while emphasizing the doctor-patient relationship supporting advanced primary care. Offered in 26 regions for a 2021 start date.
State Innovation Models
Support for statewide healthcare system transformation. Aims to create multi-payer models that raise community health status and reduce long term health risks for beneficiaries. Statewide approaches include rural areas, although few include a particular rural focus.
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Demonstration – ongoing
Creates two new payments for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services, a per beneficiary per month care management fee and a performance-based incentive, with the goal of increasing access to OUD treatment, improving health outcomes, and to the extent possible, reducing costs.
The Rural Impact initiative, a public-private partnership to address rural child poverty that is testing innovative service delivery models:
Integration Models for Parents and Children to Thrive (IMPACT) Demonstration –
Support for selected rural and tribal communities to develop innovative two-generation strategies to meet the needs of low-income families using a comprehensive, whole-family approach. November 2016 report details the Implementation of the Federal Rural IMPACT Demonstration.
Completed Rural and Rural-Relevant Demonstrations
Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI)
Supported clinician practices in sharing, adapting, and further developing comprehensive quality improvement strategies. The Practice Transformation Networks (PTNs) provided technical assistance and peer-level support and were required to recruit clinicians serving rural and medically underserved communities and small rural practices. The Support and Alignment Networks involved national and regional professional associations and public-private partnerships and supported the recruitment of clinician practices serving small, rural, and medically underserved communities. The initiative concluded September 28, 2019. Clinical practice transformation tools and resources developed through the initiative continue to be available.
ACO Track 1+ Model
Qualified as an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM), sought to encourage more small practices and hospitals to transition to performance-based risk. Incorporated elements of Track 1 and Track 3 of the Medicare Shared Savings Program, and tested a payment design with more limited downside risk than in Track 2 or Track 3. Ended December 31, 2018; participants could elect to extend through June 30, 2019.
ACO Investment Model
AIM funding was for accountable care organizations (ACOs) participating or seeking to participate in the Medicare Shared Savings Program. Tested the use of pre-paid shared savings to encourage new ACOs to form in rural and underserved areas and to encourage current Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs to transition to arrangements with greater financial risk. Ended December 31, 2018.
- Evaluation of the Accountable Care Organization Investment Model: Final Report, Abt Associates, September 2020
Frontier Extended Stay Clinics
An enhanced clinic model in frontier areas to address the needs of seriously ill or injured patients who cannot be transferred to a hospital, or who need monitoring and observation for a limited period of time. Ended April 15, 2013.
Medical Assistance Facilities (MAF)
A Montana demonstration program aimed at preserving healthcare access in frontier areas by converting full-service hospitals into low-intensity, short-stay health care service centers. Authorized by the Montana State legislature in 1987, with a Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA, the precursor to CMS) Medicare reimbursement waiver through 1993. For more information:
- Medical Assistance Facilities: A Demonstration Program to Provide Access to Health Care in Frontier Communities, HHS Office of the Inspector General, July 1993
Essential Access Community Hospital/Rural Primary Care Hospital (EACH/RPCH) Program
Enacted by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, this program recognized a limited-service facility, the Rural Primary Care Hospital, and linked each RPCH into a network tied to a larger supporting Essential Access Community Hospital. For more information:
- Developing Rural Health Networks Under the EACH/RPCH Program: Interim Report of the Evaluation of the Essential Access Community Hospital/Rural Primary Care Hospital Program, Mathematica Policy Research, September 1993
- Lessons from the Essential Access Community Hospital Program for Rural Health Network Development, Journal of Rural Health, 11(1), 32-9. Article Abstract