Schools That Care
- Need: To provide mental health services to rural Kansas students and their families.
- Intervention: The Schools That Care project provides mental health treatment and case management as well as community education events.
- Results: In three years, 545 people received services through the school social worker, and 3,227 people participated in community events.
Evidence-levelPromising (About evidence-level criteria)
Kansas’s rural Marshall and Nemaha counties are working to improve their communities' mental health by addressing behavior issues, homelessness, truancy, and suicide prevention. Within one school, three high school students had attempted suicide between 2013 and 2015 and four parents of students within the same class had died by suicide between 2007 and 2010. To improve students’ and families’ mental health, Unified School District (USD) #380 Vermilion and USD #498 Valley Heights created the Schools That Care project. Schools That Care ensures that students, their families, and the larger community have access to mental healthcare and education.
The two school districts formed a partnership with the School-Business Educational Consortium, Nemaha Valley Community Hospital, Pawnee Mental Health Services, and a for-profit telecommunications business.
Schools That Care received a 2015-2018 Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) Rural Health Care Services Outreach grant.
Schools That Care provides the following types of services:
- Mental health treatment
- Education about mental health
- Case management
Schools have created Mental Health Prevention/Early Intervention Teams and implemented Assessment, Communications, and Strategic Plans. School districts also designated an Evaluator/Strategic Planner and educated staff on the evidence-based curriculum to be used. In the second year of the grant, schools created or updated their existing mental health policies and procedures.
Schools also provide community events on mental health education and designated a “de-escalation” space where students can go while experiencing a mental health issue.
During the 2015-2018 grant cycle, one homeless family was connected with resources, and a student who was planning to drop out was connected with appropriate resources and has decided to remain in school. Other results include:
- 96% of staff have received training
- A social worker was hired to serve both school districts’ students and their families
- 545 people received behavioral health services through the social worker
- The number of unique mental health services offered at each school district increased from one to 14
- 3,227 people have participated in community events on mental health and disease management
The funding came toward the end of the school year, so it was difficult to schedule staff trainings when the school calendar for the following year was already set.
There’s an absence of available and consistent data collection at the local and state level pertaining to the mental health status of students. In addition, there’s a mental health stigma and a lack of consistent mental health messages at the local level.
Project coordinators relied on radio announcements, newspaper articles, and school websites and newsletters to advertise community events and other information.
School staff and the social worker received training in how to collect data. In addition, students and school staff received the following trainings and curriculum:
- Kansas Social, Emotional and Character Development Model Standards, for K-6th grade teachers
- Youth Mental Health First Aid, for 7th-12th grade staff and community members
- AlcoholEdu for High School, for high school students
- Yellow Ribbon Suicide Prevention Program, for 7th-12th students and staff
- Olweus Bullying Prevention Program, for K-12 students
Contact InformationPhilisha Stallbaumer, Consortium Director
School-Business Educational Consortium
Children and youth
Suicide and suicide prevention
April 17, 2019
Please contact the models and innovations contact directly for the most complete and current information about this program. Summaries of models and innovations are provided by RHIhub for your convenience. The programs described are not endorsed by RHIhub or by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. Each rural community should consider whether a particular project or approach is a good match for their community’s needs and capacity. While it is sometimes possible to adapt program components to match your resources, keep in mind that changes to the program design may impact results.