Community-Based Programs

Community-based programs may address positive health behaviors and wellness for the individual child as well as the entire family. Habits and attitudes toward health can be shaped through strengthening the relationships within families as well as the community. This model of program design allows for two-way learning between various individuals and groups within the community, which cultivates relationships and encourages social cohesion. Community-based models also help facilitate services tailored to the various needs of the communities served and organizations may choose to engage trusted community champions.

Community-based organizations, including faith-based organizations and nonprofits, are able to impact health behaviors in significant ways. Community organizations may:

Make healthy food choices available at meetings and gatherings
Implement health-related policies and practices
Make sure healthy foods are available in local food pantries
Promote and support breastfeeding
Encourage physical activity by enhancing physical structures or adding point-of-decision prompts to encourage walking
Allow community members to use their space for physical activity

The Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) recommends community-wide campaigns as a strategy to increase physical activity, particularly those involving cross-sector collaboration.

Examples of Community-Based Models

Eat Smart, Move More North Carolina is a statewide effort designed to increase residents' opportunities for healthful eating and improved physical activity. Materials are designed for a variety of settings, including communities, schools, and businesses. The program offers several online guides and resources on how to implement obesity prevention efforts in communities. Materials include guides on bringing fresh produce to settings, cooking, creating active outdoor spaces, and establishing community coalitions.

La Leche League USA is a volunteer-organized and -led international organization that provides free in-person meetings for breastfeeding education, information, and support. Each community volunteer leader completes the training provided by La Leche League, with all of the training material provided for a small fee. The leader receives support from La Leche League for setting up meetings, marketing the meetings, and setting up social media platforms. La Leche League has meetings in all 50 U.S. States, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Meeting locations and times vary based on local need and the leaders' availability. Some meetings serve multiple counties, whereas others serve individual communities. Some communities also offer virtual meetings and online forums to accommodate participants who are unable to attend in-person meetings.

Let's Go! is an obesity prevention program that engages the entire community to help foster environments that encourage healthy behaviors. Their resources provide evidence-based health promotion strategies for community use within multiple settings, including schools, child care, healthcare practices, and workplaces, as well as for families to use in their homes. The program primarily works in Maine and New Hampshire, but has partnerships across the U.S. focused on children from birth to age 18.

South Dakota's Child Safety Seat Distribution Program provides child seats to eligible parents across the state based on financial need. There is strong evidence that car seat distribution and education programs increase car seat use and increase the correct use of car seats. Research also finds that child seat distribution programs are transferable to and effective in tribal communities.

Child bicycle helmet safety programs typically provide bicycle safety information for children and parents, free or subsidized helmet distribution, and media campaigns. Evidence demonstrates these programs to be effective at increasing helmet use and reducing both fatal and non-fatal injuries — ultimately reducing healthcare costs. Programs may be school or community based.

Faithful Families Thriving Communities brings together nutrition and health educators with lay workers to deliver health programs in faith settings. The program uses direct peer education, policy and environmental supports, and community engagement to connect faith communities with messages about long-term health.

Program Clearinghouse Examples

Considerations for Implementation

Community buy-in. Programs are much more likely to be successful if they obtain community buy-in. Community buy-in may take a lot of time and effort to gain. If community members and partner organizations do not feel like the program is worth their time, they may fail to meet their commitments or fully engage.

Resources. Community-wide programs take time to coordinate and organize. Organizing a community-based program requires well-trained staff with sufficient resources to carry out plans. Without enough of the right resources, community-level interventions may not reach their intended audience or achieve the desired behavior change. If the intervention involves creating or improving physical spaces, building and/or labor costs can become expensive.

Resources to Learn More

Center for Breastfeeding
Website
Conducts research and educates providers on breastfeeding and lactation management. Supports interdisciplinary communication and care through courses, seminars, and self-study modules. Offers a comprehensive, evidence-based online lactation counselor training course (LCTC) focused on clinical counseling and assessment skills for in-person, home-based services.
Organization(s): Healthy Children Project, Inc.

A Quasi-Experimental Study to Mobilize Rural Low-Income Communities to Assess and Improve the Ecological Environment to Prevent Childhood Obesity
Document
Examines the ability of low income, rural communities to support and incorporate community coaching as a method to create and maintain an environment of healthy eating and physical activity for the prevention of childhood obesity.
Author(s): Peters, P., Gold, A., Abbott, A., et al.
Citation: BMC Public Health, 16, 376
Date: 2016